Category Archives: Subaru

So, I did this thing…

What did I do this weekend?

I traded the STI for a 2018 Jeep Wrangler Unlimited.

I now have all these parts to sell but need to spend some time trying to appropriately price them.  I still have the winter wheels (OEM) and tires (new Blizzaks), a CNT catted downpipe that’s never been installed, a Cobb AP (unmarried), a Nameless cold air intake (was installed a few years but is near perfect), and a few other things (turbo blanket, EBCS, Walbro fuel pump).

The funds I receive for those parts will go to Jeep parts!

I was considering another STI but didn’t want to buy one and see Subaru release an engine revision soon after.  I also considered a Golf R, but quickly gravitated to the Wrangler instead.  I briefly looked at Focus RSs but for some reason, I’m not attracted to them, regardless of 350HP.

Oh, I got $17,500 for my 2011 STI.  That’s a healthy down payment.  That’s the highest offer I’ve received from a dealer (I’ve seen $14K and $16K).  The car had 44K miles and had wear and tear associated with a 7 year old car. It had 3 door dings and some chipped paint on the hood.  KBB quoted me $18.5K and $19.5K a week later.  I think I did well enough.  This is the value power of STIs.  If I’d had a different brand, especially domestic, they would’ve given me maybe half that.  This is the main reason I decided to go Wrangler…they’ve more value power than even STIs.

The car was stock when I turned it in (that was mandatory for me to do…I was not going to shaft the next owner).  Before I returned it to stock, it only had the Cobb OTS stage 1 with AEM intake tune and the Nameless cold air intake.  Was easy enough to put it back to stock…would’ve been a bit more difficult if I’d added those other parts like I’d planned.

Anyways, I’ll keep this site up for now and I may occasionally post about WRXs or other sports cars.

Porsche Boxster – Sounds Like A WRX!

I was curious about this, then I clicked the link, which took me to a R&T page that had a YouTube video. I was floored.

The video in question:

It took a sec for me to understand that the sound wasn’t coming from the WRX but from a Porsche Boxster.  And it sounded VERY nice.  Very Subaru’ish but still very nice.

Need A New Y-pipe! :(

Some updates with me:

I’ve been out of work since late April of 2016, as I quit my job.  I’d been in financial limp mode since then.  I’m about to start working again and can resume supporting my hobby activities.

I’ve not driven the car all that much since then.  Before that, I’d taken a trip to Roanoke, VA and back (was doing some remote work there).  There’s maybe 25K miles on the car, but I recently had to look under the car to assess a tire that wouldn’t hold air.  I was shocked at the amount of rust I saw on the Y-pipe…it looks like it’s already allowing air to escape.  So, I need a new Y-pipe.  Most places sell the Y-pipe with the mid-pipe.  Also, most places sell these for mucho dinero ($600+).

Now, I have a CNT catted 3″ downpipe now, as well as Nameless axleback muffler deletes.  I found an aftermarket mid- and y-pipe for under $300 but that set is 2.5″…I’d rather have 3″ all the way back, not 3″ tapering to 2.5″, but I don’t think I’ve a choice in the matter.  Well, I do, but the next choice is $600+.

I still need to install the CNT downpipe…it’s been sitting in the garage in it’s box the last 2 years.  There’s really nothing keeping me from installing it other than utter laziness.  I really should get it installed soon.

My next purchase needs to be deep socket lug nuts.  The OEM lugs work fine with the OEM wheels, which I still use with winter tires in the winter.  They work fine with the TSWs functionally, but they’re difficult to install without scratching the wheels.

I should also consider looking under the car to ensure the suspension bushings aren’t damaged.  I thought I saw one that was cracked the last time I swapped the wheels out this past spring.

Updates done!  🙂

Subaru Gains Class Win in Nurburgring 24 Hour Race

http://www.car24news.com/subaru-wrx-sti-scores-back-to-back-class-win-in-a-very-wet-nurburgring-24-hrs/

I post the above for those that insist that Subaru is no longer relevant in motorsports.  Subaru certainly isn’t the only manufacturer in the SP3T class.  Thanks to Car24News.com for the above article.

Note that the SP3T class requires 2.0L or less in engine displacement, as well.  They’re using the EJ207 as a base in their NBR race cars, which doesn’t represent USDM but is nonetheless one of their core engines.  This also means that this car will not be competing with the Focus RS, as the RS is using a larger displacement engine (2.3L, I believe).  I mention this because several people insist that the RS can do better…it so, it’ll have to step down in displacement to prove that…that’s certainly not going to happen, because they’d have to either homogenize a 2.0L version of the car and then step down.  Or, Subaru would have to use the 2.5L variant of the EJ, which would put them in the same class as the Focus RS would race within (that’s not going to happen, either).

Subaru Gains Class Win in Nurburgring 24 Hour Race

Leave a reply

http://www.car24news.com/subaru-wrx-sti-scores-back-to-back-class-win-in-a-very-wet-nurburgring-24-hrs/

I post the above for those that insist that Subaru is no longer relevant in motorsports.  Subaru certainly isn’t the only manufacturer in the SP3T class.  Thanks to Car24News.com for the above article.

Note that the SP3T class requires 2.0L or less in engine displacement, as well.  They’re using the EJ207 as a base in their NBR race cars, which doesn’t represent USDM but is nonetheless one of their core engines.  This also means that this car will not be competing with the Focus RS, as the RS is using a larger displacement engine (2.3L, I believe).  I mention this because several people insist that the RS can do better…it so, it’ll have to step down in displacement to prove that…that’s certainly not going to happen, because they’d have to either homogenize a 2.0L version of the car and then step down.  Or, Subaru would have to use the 2.5L variant of the EJ, which would put them in the same class as the Focus RS would race within (that’s not going to happen, either).

Subaru Isle of Man – Fast Lap

http://www.roadandtrack.com/motorsports/a29557/at-subarus-record-shattering-isle-of-man-lap-the-fastest-run-never-happened/

Higgins’s flying lap record attempt in a Subaru WRX STI is a recently-established tradition. Historically, the TT is a bikes-only event. But Subaru is a major sponsor of the annual two-week racing festival, and Higgins, born and raised on the Isle of Man, is deeply respected in the Manx motorsports world.

This is a significant quote of the article if you’ve been hearing that these attempts are nothing because Isle of Man people only care about motorcycling.  I’m pretty sure they care about Higgins just as well as the event itself and history of the event.  People that think that the time was slow need to understand that if the time was related to a motorcycle, it would’ve been a qualifying time (ie, it’s running as fast as many of the motorcycles that attend the events).  Trivializing the feats is just ridiculous.  IMO, the only people that can legitimately criticize the runs are people that have driven their cars at an equal or faster pace at the Isle of Man while also using a 4-wheeled vehicle.  And just because other car makers haven’t run their cars in the event, doesn’t make the feats any less significant.  Nothing is stopping other car manufacturers from attempting the same, right?

As well, I’ve heard such comments as, “A Z06 or Ferrari 458 Italia can equal the feat”.  I highly doubt that, as neither of those will have the AWD advantage to  go balls-out like Higgins has been doing.  There is no run-off, the streets are bumpy and not designed with speed in mind, yet the Higgins has no problem running the Subaru quickly and without mishap on those streets.  Another AWD car (probably of similar genre) would be the better choice.  I’ve actually love to see other manufacturers run the Isle of Man!

Ford Focus RS – Hyped?

http://www.caranddriver.com/comparisons/2016-ford-focus-rs-vs-2015-subaru-wrx-sti-2016-volkswagen-golf-r-final-scoring-performance-data-and-complete-specs-page-5

The new (2017 model) Ford Focus RS is the most hyped car I’ve ever seen.  All last year, people saw the buzzwords “drift mode” and “350 HP”.

Well, I want to point out a few things.

  1.  You don’t have to have a built-in mode in order to drift in an AWD car.  Seriously.
  2.  The Focus RS may make 350 HP at the crank, but a good portion of it isn’t making it to the wheels.

Let’s talk about bullet #2.

If you view the above URL, and look at the quarter-mile stats, you’ll notice that all three cars (the Ford Focus, the Subaru WRX STI, and the VW Golf R) have almost identical times and trap speeds.  The Focus has a 45-60 (crank) HP advantage, depending on the car being compared.  The trap speed of the Focus RS doesn’t show that advantage at ALL.  The Focus ran a 105 MPH trap speed, the STI ran a 104 MPH trap speed, and the Golf R ran a 105 MPH trap.

The car is rather new and hasn’t been compared/reviewed by other magazines (R&T, MT, Automobile).  In fact, I’ve only seen two dynos.

Also, I saw someone post that the car has overboost and that it runs overboost at 15 sec intervals and resets after that time frame.  It also resets after shifting, so if an RS is running a 1/4th-mile track, overboost will be reset at every shift, meaning overboost timing out isn’t a factor in the 1/4th-mile, yet it still only manages a 105 MPH trap.

Now, each of those three cars are designed for spirited driving, yes, but they are not designed with the quarter-mile in mind.  But again, that applies to all three cars.

The bottom line is, the Focus RS is either over-rated from the factory (not an unusual thing for Ford, from what I’ve heard), or something is sapping all that power, because it’s like 50 HP is AWOL.  It isn’t a gearing issue (the gearing is hardly aggressive enough to affect a 50 HP advantage).  It isn’t a weight issue (the RS weighs just as much as the STI).  A dyno chart I’ve seen hints that the RS isn’t peaky and doesn’t make a lot of power up high.  Another dyno chart showed 270 peak wheel HP, which is only 20 more than what an STI typically makes.  I’d like to see more dyno charts.

Another thing that people are hyping is that the Focus RS is far more upgradeable.  I’m not so sure about that.  This car is pretty much maxed out from the factory.  You might be able to get some minor gains from it but you’re not going to see a giant leap in HP with bolt-ons.  The argument against this is that the Mustang Ecoboost  has high upgrade potential, so the RS will have the same.  No.  The RS is using more robust parts already, just to get 40 more HP than the Ecoboost engine in the Mustang.  Any car that offers 350 HP from the factory is going to be over-engineered to the point that it’s going to be maxed out from the onset — that’s the case with the CLA45 AMG as well…it saw some gains in it’s latest iteration, but those weren’t all that significant.

Another thing I’ve heard:  The Focus will make the STI obsolete.  I doubt this.  Subaru has always marched by their own drum beat.  This isn’t the first time they’ve had competition.  Some say that Subaru is stagnant, which is true, but what they have works well enough for them.  Not every turbocharged AWD four-cylinder needs to make 350 – 400 HP.  We hear the same thing about the BRZ and FR-S, but I think those cars do fine with the 200 HP they have…they aren’t meant to be powerhouse-type cars, and neither is the STI.

The Focus isn’t really bringing anything to the table that Subaru doesn’t already have.  While the STI is using the old EJ257, the WRX uses the FA20DIT.  The AWD platform in the STI is certainly going to be more robust, though.  The Focus RS AWD platform is too “wizardly”.  There’s too much hocus-pocus going on with it.  It’s a GT-R wannabe.  We know it’ll put all power to the left- or right-side wheels and put up to 70% of the power to the rears when needed, but it’s basically a FWD-biased AWD system…not particularly good as it applies to track usage (the CLA45 AMG isn’t a good track car either, but it wasn’t designed with the track in mind…the Focus RS WAS designed with racing in mind).  The Focus RS’s AWD system is great for highway fuel economy because it’ll cruise with only the front wheels being powered.  That’s cool, but not something that Subaru is interested in.  If fuel economy is a major factor for you as an owner, the STI isn’t the best car for you and Subaru isn’t going to change their mind on that.  If that’s what you want, look down toward the WRX instead, but the WRX and the Focus RS are hardly competitors, as the Focus RS is going to out-class the WRX in a major way (on the track and on the street).  Those that are expecting Subaru to be afraid of the Focus RS don’t understand Subaru at all.

What I’d like to see is the other magazine publishers (R&T, Automobile, and/or MT) doing a comparison similar to what C&D did.  One thing that C&D didn’t do that seems very hokey is that they didn’t comment on the HP discrepancy of the Focus RS.  It almost appears that they purposely ignored it.  Fortunately, it was noticed by the readers and it has been heavily discussed in the comments of the article I mentioned above.  I also found another forum (http://www.focusrs.org/) that has a thread of similar concerns, from actual owners of Focus RSs. So yeah, this is a real concern, especially for someone willing to spend between $30K-$40K on such a car.  It means the product they bought isn’t as advertised.

Do I want Subaru to improve the STI?  Yes, I do.  Do I want a FA20DIT-engined STI?  NO.  Why?  I believe that engine won’t do well in an STI.  There’s a reason why the USDM and JDM STIs aren’t running the FA20DIT engines, and it’s probably because they want an engine that is just as peaky as the EJ207 and EJ257.  The FA20DIT is not that engine.  I believe I’ve said this in other posts on this website, too.  Subaru’s Nurburgring car was powered by the EJ207.  All of their recent JDM special editions have been powered by EJ207 variants.  When I see Subaru using the FA20DIT in their STI variants (street and track vehicles), I’ll eat crow.   A new version of the Focus RS isn’t going to push Subaru into desperation.  I honestly think Subaru doesn’t care.

Here’s What You Need to Know About Porsche’s New Turbo Flat-Four Engines

From Road & Track:

Unlike the 911, which is using a 3.0 liter flat-six in both the Carrera and Carrera S, just with different turbos, the 718 twins will have a 2.0 or a 2.5 liter turbocharged flat four. The 2.0 in the base cars will have 300 horsepower and 266 lb-ft of torque while the 718 Boxster S will have a 2.5 liter flat-four turbo with 340 horsepower and 295 lb-ft of torque. There could also be a GTS version coming with 365 horsepower.

 

Porsche is going all-in on turbocharging.

Posted by Road & Track Magazine on Tuesday, December 15, 2015

 

In the Facebook comments, I already see people equating the upcoming 718 engines with Subaru EJs.  Now, when has Porsche ever not blazed their own trail?  Porsche will almost certainly ensure this engine will generate glorious (or at least non-nasty) sounds.  Subaru’s trademark sounds are due to the EJs running unequal-length headers.  I highly doubt Porsche will do something stupid like adopt unequal length headers, especially if they opt to use twin-scroll turbochargers.  With luxury-sport cars such as these Porsche variants, they’re going to ensure the car sounds like it looks…fast, powerful, and sleek.

Subaru Knock Monitoring – Cobb Tuning

I read Cobb Tuning’s Facebook postings and saw the following the other day:  http://www.cobbtuning.com/subaru-knock-monitoring-and-dit-knock-logic-changes/

Most people that have turbocharged Subarus and either have a Cobb Accessport or want one always ask how does one monitor for knock.  I’ve elaborated on this in the past (here) but the information in the link comes straight from the source!

Excerpt:

Detonation events are inevitable and will occur from time to time on any modern vehicle running on pump gas.  Your car is built to recognize these events and take the appropriate action to defend against them causing any damage.  The Subaru knock detection system tends to err on the side of caution.  This makes it common to see “false knock.”  False knock occurs when the ECU corrects for a knock event but the noise registered is due to other noises that aren’t necessarily detonation or harmful to the engine.  This often happens accelerating from a stop while letting the clutch out, during gear shifts (more so if grunting while shifting), accelerating at low RPM in a high gear, under cruise on the freeway, and during abrupt throttle changes.

Read the rest at the above hyperlink.  Enjoy!

How to Avoid Blown Ringlands in your Subaru WRX or STI – Viking Speed Shop

This is a good read, and I’ve elaborated on some of the article’s listed items in the past (here, here, and here), but I’m not a mechanic nor do I claim to fully understand a combustion engine’s inner workings.  This article comes directly from Viking Speed Shop.

An excerpt:

While largely limited to the late model WRX and STI with the EJ255 and EJ257 motors, there’s been some concern raised about the sheer numbers of ringland failures being reported on the forums. Our goal with this article is to address why this is likely occurring and how you can guard yourself from it happening to your Subaru. Some of these may seem like common sense to most, but for many younger or first time turbo car owners it may be new.

Read more @ http://www.vikingspeedshop.com/how-to-avoid-blown-ringlands-in-your-subaru-wrx-or-sti/